12/24/2023 0 Comments Decipher chatTo better imagine what a “feature” is, think words, phrases, and sentences. The program analyzes all these examples, extracts some features of each dialog, and assigns a number to these features, representing how often dialogs with that feature ended in positive results for the negotiator. In the particular case of the Facebook negotiation chat bot, you give it examples of negotiation dialogs with the whole situation properly annotated - what the initial state was, the preferences of the negotiator, what was said, what the result was, etc. This consists of well-described examples of the behavior that the robot is trying to simulate. When developing a robot like this, you start with something called a “training data set”. I will not bother you with all the technical details, but it is important to understand some basic principles about how this technology works. So how does it work in simple terms? Machine Learning If you are interested in more details, read the official article or just get the code from github. The research was published in June, including all code and training data used for the experiment. Then it is supposed to negotiate with its counterparty, be it a human or another robot, about how to split the treasure among themselves. ![]() The so-called robot is given a set of items (consisting of books, hats, and balls) and some preferences for which items it wants more than others. The system tries to simulate dialog and negotiation. Just please be careful and shut it down in time like the Facebook engineers did. Anyone can actually download and run this AI, as well as observe the new language on their own. So what was Facebook actually doing? And how did the robots “almost become sentient”? The whole project is well-documented and available to the general public. However, my goal is to educate - to show how so-called AI works - not to take sides. Maybe it will help people sleep without thinking of SKYNET. ![]() I tried to explain the situation to some of my friends and eventually decided that it was worth writing down. I also find it curious that none of the articles actually explained what happened in terms that people would understand. The problem is that false but catchy news is much easier to spread than anything else. Even some of the media that originally offered a very scandalous version of this event eventually edited the content to be less dramatic (like The Independent for example). Fortunately, there are still sane people out there, so there have been quite a few articles explaining why all of the doomsday talk is complete nonsense (like the ones published by Snopes or CNBC). Some of these articles would let you believe that this was a very close call - that scientists at Facebook barely shut down the AI before it could take over the world. The media is just loving these clickbait titles. There have been so many articles published about Facebook shutting down its robots after they developed their own language.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |